Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/388
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Belghaouti, Amel | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-20T10:58:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-05-20T10:58:57Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/388 | - |
dc.description.abstract | According to bibliographic analysis, previous work shows that there are several methods of evaluating rainfall flows on the basis of various simplifying hypotheses presented. However, their common point of view lies in the fact that these methods give the maximum flow at the outlet for these simplifying hypotheses. Some methods take into account parameters due to rainfall and climate, while others assume certain parameters to be constant throughout the duration of rainfall. The objective of our work consists in presenting these methods, making a comparative study according to the presented works and making a case study by opting for the most used usual methods. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | fr | en_US |
dc.subject | Assainissement. Contribution. Débit. Eaux pluviales | en_US |
dc.subject | Sanitation. Contribution. Debit. Rainy waters. | en_US |
dc.title | Contribution a l'étude des différentes méthodes d'évaluation du débit d'eaux pluviales. | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Conception des Systèmes d'Assainissement |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
6-0026-21D.pdf | Full Text | 5,35 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.